
Lawsuit
American Association of University Professors v. Rubio
A case challenging the Trump administration’s policy of ideological deportation.
On March 25, 2025, the Knight Institute filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s policy of arresting, detaining, and deporting noncitizen students and faculty who participate in pro-Palestinian activism. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), AAUP’s Harvard, NYU, and Rutgers campus chapters, and the Middle East Studies Association, argues that the policy chills noncitizens from speaking and, by extension, robs these organizations and their U.S. citizen members of noncitizens’ perspectives on a matter of significant public debate.
The lawsuit responds to a climate of repression and fear on university campuses. Federal agencies are attempting to deport multiple individuals for their pro-Palestinian advocacy, including Mahmoud Khalil, a leader of protests at Columbia University. These actions have sent chills through the community of noncitizen students and faculty on campuses around the country, causing some to pull out of academic conferences, stay home from protests, and withdraw from other forms of public advocacy and engagement.
The lawsuit alleges that the administration’s policy of ideological deportation violates the First Amendment right of the plaintiffs to hear from and associate with noncitizen students and faculty, that it is unconstitutionally vague, and that it violates the Administrative Procedure Act. The suit seeks a court order declaring that the policy is unlawful and enjoining the federal government from enforcing it.
Status: On April 29, 2025, the district court largely denied the government’s motion to dismiss. On June 2, 2025, the court denied the government’s motion for a protective order to bar discovery and dispense with a trial on the merits. The case is scheduled for a trial on July 7, 2025.
Case Information: American Association of University Professors v. Rubio, No. 1:25-cv-10685 (D.Mass).
Press Statements
-
Court Sets Expedited Trial in Challenge to Deportation of Student Protesters
-
Federal Court Says First Amendment Bars Government From Deporting Students and Faculty on Basis of Political Viewpoint, Says Challenge to Trump Policy Can Go Forward
-
Knight Institute Asks Court to Block Trump Policy of Deporting Students and Faculty for Lawful Speech
-
AAUP, Middle East Studies Association, Knight Institute Sue Over Trump Policy of Arresting and Threatening to Deport Students and Faculty for Lawful Speech
Analysis
Legal Filings
Click to highlight response chains
-
D.Mass.
-
Government's Response
-
Joint Motion to Enter Stipulation and Proposed Order
-
Proposed Order
-
Plaintiffs' Reply (leave to file granted)
-
Government's Notice of Sealed Submission of Documents
-
Stipulation and Order
-
Plaintiffs' Motion for a Protective Order (for Document Production and Exchange of Confidential Information)
-
Exhibit A: Proposed Order
-
Joint Motion to Enter Stipulation & Proposed Order
-
Stipulation & Proposed Order
-
Order (re: Protective Order to Limit Discovery)
-
Order (re: Protective Order Barring Witness Retaliation)
-
Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Reply
-
Plaintiffs' Proposed Reply
-
Government's Motion for Leave to File Reply
-
Exhibit A: Government's Proposed Reply
-
Government's Response
-
Plaintiffs' Opposition
-
Declaration of Scott Wilkens
-
Exhibit A
-
Government's Motion for Protective Order (to Limit Discovery)
-
Exhibit A
-
Exhibit B
-
Exhibit C
-
Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order (Barring Witness Retaliation)
-
Exhibit C: Proposed Protective Order
-
Exhibit B: Declaration of Noam Biale
-
Exhibit A: Declaration of Xiangnong Wang
-
Redacted Administrative Record
-
Government's Motion to Provisionally Seal Administrative Record
-
Transcript of Status Conference
-
Plaintiffs' Opposition (to Motion for Protective Order)
-
Government's Motion for a Protective Order
-
Plaintiffs' Letter (re: status of discovery)
-
Transcript of Case Management Conference
-
Order (setting trial date)
-
Opinion
-
Plaintiffs' Reply
-
Declaration of Ramya Krishnan
-
Exhibit A
-
Exhibit B
-
Exhibit C
-
Exhibit D
-
Exhibit E
-
Exhibit F
-
Exhibit G
-
Exhibit H
-
Government's Opposition
-
Declaration of John Armstrong
-
Declaration of Andre Watson
-
Amicus Briefs (in support of plaintiffs)
-
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts & 18 other states
-
Amicus Brief of The Presidents' Alliance
-
Amicus Brief of 30 Academic Associations
-
Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
-
Declaration of Ramya Krishnan
-
Exhibits AA–II
-
Exhibits N–Z
-
Exhibits A–M
-
Declaration of Aslı Ü. Bâli
-
Declaration of Veena Dubal
-
Complaint
-